


一 | BRUSSELS -- A European Union decision on whether to authorize the use of the controversial chemical herbicide glyphosate in the 27-nation bloc for at least 10 more years was delayed for a month after member countries failed to agree on Friday.The chemical, which is widely used in the 27-nation bloc, is approved on the EU market until mid-December. Representatives of the EU’s executive arm and member countries voted Friday in favor of renewing its authorization until 2033, despite protests from environmental groups. But to be adopted, the 10-year extension proposed by the European Commission required a “qualified majority,” defined as 55% of the 27 members representing at least 65% of the total EU population of some 450 million people. Several member states abstained, and that was not achieved. The European Commission is now expected to amend its proposal before another vote takes place next month. Ultimately, if no consensus is found, the Commission will have the final say.Green members of the European Parliament welcomed the delay and urged member states to vote for a complete ban of glyphosate.“It is irresponsible to again renew the authorization of the use of glyphosate,” said Bas Eickhout, the vice-chair of the Parliament's environment committee. "This would give the big agri a blank check to earn billions by selling a pesticide for which there are still big gaps in knowledge about the effects on our health, and at the same time poses large risks for European biodiversity.”Over the past decade, glyphosate, used in products like the weedkiller Roundup, has been at the heart of heated scientific debate about whether it causes cancer and its possible disruptive effect on the environment. The chemical was introduced by Monsanto in 1974 as an effective way of killing weeds while leaving crops and plants intact.The France-based International Agency for Research on Cancer, which is part of the World Health Organization, classified it as a “probable human carcinogen” in 2015. The EU’s food safety agency had paved the way for the 10-year extension when it said in July it “did not identify critical areas of concern” in the use of glyphosate. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found in 2020 that the herbicide did not pose a health risk to people, but a federal appeals court in California ordered the agency last year to reexamine that ruling, saying it wasn’t supported by enough evidence.EU member states are responsible for authorizing the use of products including the chemical on their national markets, following a safety evaluation.In France, President Emmanuel Macron had committed to ban glyphosate before 2021 but has since backpedaled. Germany, the EU's biggest economy, plans to stop using it from next year, but the decision could be challenged. Luxembourg’s national ban, for instance, was overturned in court earlier this year.Greenpeace had called on the EU to reject the market reapproval, citing studies indicating that glyphosate may cause cancer and other health problems and could also be toxic to bees. The agroindustry sector, however, claims there are no viable alternatives.“Whatever the final decision that emerges from this re-authorization process, there is one reality that member states will have to face up to,” said Copa-Cogeca, a group representing farmers and agricultural cooperatives. “There is as of yet no equivalent alternative to this herbicide, and without it, many agricultural practices, notably soil conservation, would be rendered complex, leaving farmers with no solutions.”。

二 |

三 | 当地政府、教育行政部门能以积极的姿态及时介入并作出回应,与网民开展良性互动值得肯定,该家委会支持学校和班级工作的热情我们也可以理解。但似乎相关部门随后的解释并不能平息网民激烈的反应和公众的热议。很显然,作为一个班级的家委会,如此“平摊”收取高额班费的做法已经是严重越位和错位了。为了方便家长,减少琐碎费用缴纳次数,集中一次性缴纳班级代管经费,其出发点或许不错,但此举是否符合有关财务制度和经费管理制度暂且不说,不符合《教育法》等相关法规政策倒是有据可查。

四 | 人均2000元的班费对于大多数家庭也许可以承受,但对于一些困难家庭来说就是一笔不小的负担。

五 | 实际上,这笔班费由家委会征得全体家长同意的说法恐怕也不符合事实,要不然也就不会有市民以家长的身份投诉了,如果有人不同意而被收取相关费用,则涉嫌变相强制收费。虽说该班级家委会对班费支出账目明朗,记录详细,接受全体家长的查阅和监督,但其中“自愿征订学科作业资料费等”一项支出就高达34090.5元,无论从家庭经济负担和学生课业负担上恐怕都说不过去。根据2012年《教育部关于建立中小学幼儿园家长委员会的指导意见》,家长委员会的基本职责包括“参与学校管理”“参与教育工作”以及“沟通学校与家庭”三项,都没有涉及向家长征收和使用班费等任何财务方面的职能。事实上,2010年国家发展改革委、教育部下发的《关于规范中小学服务性收费和代收费管理有关问题的通知》明确,严禁将讲义资料、试卷、电子阅览、计算机上机、取暖等作为服务性收费和代收费事项;也不得将国家已明令禁止或明确规定纳入公用经费开支的项目列为服务性收费和代收费项目。成立家委会的本意是针对学校教育和家庭教育的突出问题,重点做好德育、保障学生安全健康、推动减轻中小学生课业负担、化解家校矛盾等工作。这次班费事件,给所有家委会组织敲了一记警钟,家委会要回归到自己的本职上来,不要随意去越位、错位。违反国家有关规定向受教育者收取费用,不仅会让家委会变味,也增加了家委会的财务风险,甚至会连累学校和相关老师。学校以及相关教师也需要很好地反思并从中吸取教训,学校对家委会管理不能缺位。《教育部关于建立中小学幼儿园家长委员会的指导意见》明确规定“家长委员会应在学校的指导下履行职责。”即便家委会是在学校不知情的情况下收缴班费,脱离学校的指导和监管,校方依然无法推卸失察、失管的责任。

六 | 学校既不能让家委会流于形式、无所作为,也不能任其越位错位,更不能借家委会之名违规向家长收费。(责编:徐玉涵、曲源) 分享让更多人看到 返回搜狐,查看更多责任编辑:
Current article:http://c7akict.pisezuibanzoukou.cyou/ryh5/20260826/4871816.html
Published on:03:06:27